|
Learning
from Rod Serling
"One
thing you kneed to no about writing good is this, editing
is won of the must impotent parts of the prosthesis
its also defiantly the hardiest. You, sir with the café
cup on one hand end the confuse look on you're phase;
you half a question"?
"What is this crap? Do you have any idea how hard
this is to read?"
'But due you no how heard these are two rite
ore how fats I'm tipping. Yes, maim, you wit you're
fete on the stoolie? Watts year question?
"Don't you know how to spell? My daughter
in third grade can spell better than this."
Butt dose she no how to ewes a commuter? How bout a
spill cheekier? May be she should of leaned sense nun
of this is miss spelled a cording to my competitor.
The man in the soot setting be hind that beg desk --
I spouse you also has a comet".
"Pardon me for saying so, but you look terribly
foolish making such incredibly obvious mistakes. You
can't actually expect me to take anything you say here
seriously, can you?"
"Thyme is moony you a busyness man should
Shirley no that, I jest don't halve thyme to checker
ever little think." "You wit the skate bored
and the buggy pans.'
"Dude, this is so not right. Man, if you're
going to lay some words on us, they like so have to
be the right words or we're out of here."
" Evan you? I though you wood understand
Don't get sew hang up on a little think lake spelling
and punk chew a shun. Hay sir, wear are you going?"
"I've got a headache, and it's not because
of the coffee. Call me when you've learned how to write
something I can read, something I don't have to work
so hard to understand."
'Ma'am, donate tell me your leafing to.'
"Yes, me, too. I can hardly wait for little
Amanda to get home from school so that I can have an
intelligent conversation. Don't send me anything until
you've gotten a little smarter or at least until you're
able to make me think you're a little smarter."
End you sir, yore company, with out me Yule". .
.
"We'll get along just fine. And you're absolutely
right: time is money, but thyme is an herb. I have an
appointment with my doctor. At least he knows the difference
between a comma and a coma."
'Dud? "
"That's dude, man. And sorry, dude, but
I'm gone, too. This whole scene is so bogus. And, man,
I know some dudes who are punks, but they've never chewed
a shun. Saying that about them is just the ultimate
rudeness. Later, dude."
"Weight! Wade! Come bake! Re member-- its knot
how you said it but watt ewe say." Don't judge
a book buy it's clover."" Thick off the substance
knot the stile. Pleas comb back! "I half sum rely
grate ideas. Pull lease, I knead ewe! Aye cant go on
a loan!'''
[Fade to black.]
[Rod Serling's voice over a wavering field of stars]
"There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is
known to our writer. It is a dimension as vast as a
Charles Dickens novel and as timeless as good poetry.
It is the middle ground between errors and mistakes,
between antonyms and homonyms, and it lies between the
pit of man's ignorance, and the summit of his laziness.
. . . This is the dimension of the editor. It is an
area which we call . . .
The Twi-Write Zone.
Mr. Arthur Waller -- inexperienced writer, surveyor
of light popular fiction, and viewer of late-night reruns
-- has fallen into a world of readers, a world that
is foreign and strange to him and one about which he
has, for too many years, made wrong assumptions. He
started the day as he always had -- with a light breakfast
and the cartoons from the Times -- and then, when an
idea occurred to him, wrote a fast draft of an article.
He felt good about it and assumed that this is how professional
writers feel upon writing something and that this piece
which he had composed was now ready for print and the
public. What he didn't understand was that this public
was a far different creature than he had imagined. To
his astonishment, they would accuse, not forgive; were
anxious, not patient; were intelligent, not slow-witted;
were easily distracted and unwilling to do the writer's
work for him. In short, they expected the writer to
do his part, and then and only then would the readers
do their part. This is the world in which our writer
is lost, a place from which he can never escape but
which he must try to understand. His only hope is, of
course, to change his mind and his habits if he is to
survive and thrive in . . .
The Twi-Write Zone.
Let us then offer him, and anyone else who might venture
into this sometimes strange and always difficult world,
some hints for editing and proofreading which will help
him survive:
1. Learn the basics of punctuation and sentence structure
from a good composition teacher and/or from a good handbook.
This is as fundamental as a carpenter learning how to
pound nails or a fireman learning to climb a ladder.
Punctuating correctly and writing and recognizing complete
sentences should be so automatic for writers that you
hardly have to think about it.
2. At least once a year read Strunk and White's The
Elements of Style. It's an excellent refresher in the
fundamentals of good writing and a compact book (only
about 90 pages) that all writers -- no matter how long
they've been writing -- can learn and relearn from.
3. Read well-written books since doing so will help
you absorb the language, conventions, and sentence structure
of the writer's work. Most popular writers, like Stephen
King, Lavyrle Spencer, and John Grisham, writers who
crank out a book once a year or every few months, don't
take much time to rewrite or edit carefully and thoroughly.
Their language is often simple and at or near a tenth-grade
reading level and their sentence structure lacking in
complexity. They may tell good stories, but they rarely
challenge or help other writers improve their mechanics
or stretch themselves stylistically. Read good contemporary
writers like Tim O'Brien, Annie Proulx, Gabriel García
Marquez, Cormac McCarthy, Louise Erdrich, Leslie Marmon
Silko, Jon Casey, Sherman Alexie, Gretel Ehrlich, and
others. Read classics -- Hemingway, Austin, Joyce, Faulkner,
Steinbeck, etc. People who read a lot typically are
more capable writers and editors than nonreaders are.
4. Get feedback from another writer or join a writers'
response group. Find others who are also trying to write
for readers and who would be willing and able to read
your work and help you improve it. A group like this
can not only improve the quality of your writing but
also motivate you to write regularly and write more.
5. Read, reread, and then put your work away for a day
or two before reading it again. Getting away from something
you've written and worked hard on is the best way to
help yourself see it with fresh eyes again. Sometimes
even just being able to forget about the draft by watching
ER or Oprah or by sleeping or going for a run can clear
your mind of your preconceptions about what you've said
and allow you to come back to the piece with something
approaching a tough, critical reader's eye. Distance
not only makes the heart grow fonder but also makes
the editor's eye grow clearer.
6. Use but don't rely exclusively on spell-checkers.
They catch things that aren't words, but they don't
read in context and as a result can't tell you if you
have the wrong words. They can only tell you if you
have words.
7. Buy and use a good dictionary. Not only that, read
it. Try reading one page every day or every other day,
and in a notebook write down each unfamiliar word that
strikes you as useful, distinctive, and worth including
in your own writing along with its definition. This
is an excellent, efficient way to improve your vocabulary
and your spelling skills.
8. Read your work out loud to yourself. Listen to what
you've written because doing so will often help you
notice repetition, unintentional rhyme, or awkwardness
that isn't noticeable when you simply look at the words
on the page. If it sounds wrong or makes you stumble
as you're reading, something probably is wrong, something
that needs to be changed.
9. Read your work backwards, one sentence at a time.
This may sound strange, but it works, especially for
people who have trouble with fragments or those who
have worked on a piece so long and reread it so many
times that they've nearly memorized it. Start at the
end of the piece and read the last sentence first, then
the second to the last sentence, and so forth through
the piece. This forces you to look at individual grammatical
units and is more likely to help you recognize fragments
because now they're isolated and read in a different,
incomplete context. Doing this can also help you notice
missing words, spelling errors, and grammatical problems
that you didn't notice because when reading the piece
from beginning to end you focus on meaning; reading
backwards removes meaning and allows you to focus on
the mechanics of how you said things.
10 According to Raymond Carver in his essay "On
Writing" (Fires: Essays, Poems, Stories, Vintage
Contemporaries, 1989), "Evan Connell said once
that he knew he was finished with a short story when
he found himself going through it and taking out commas
and then going through the story again and putting commas
back in the same places. I like that way of working
on something. I respect that kind of care for what is
being done. That's all we have, finally, the words,
and they had better be the right ones, with the punctuation
in the right places so that they can best say what they
are meant to say." This is the attitude that any
writer worth his salt should bring to his or her writing.
We can only hope that Arthur Waller is able to
adapt and open himself to the possibilities that exist
around him, for though the physical elements of his
life might appear unchanged, the real world of the writer
in which he now finds himself will change him and the
way he works, or he will forever find himself lost in
. . . The Twi-Write Zone!
(Randy
Koch teaches creative writing and English composition
at Laredo Community College, and is editor of LCC's
La Frontera arts journal.)
|